This is a recent email from a wise reader of this blog. [Paul IF]
“The more I study the collection of evidence related to Lockerbie, the less sure I become that any of it is genuine – other than those items which were the possessions of the victims and which were later identified by their families. We know PT35b was fake evidence and was probably planted after the explosion, the Malta clothes are just too convenient for the prosecution and there are so many anomalies with the colour, design and labels, not to mention the whole Gauci story, that it seems possible that they might have been planted after the explosion. The white-then-black bits of Toshiba cassette radio, the intact Toshiba manual which had supposedly been wrapped around the IED, and so on. Is it possible that the forensic evidence was also faked? Indeed was any of the Lockerbie evidence genuine? ”
“Is there any genuine, honest evidence; and, ultimately, was the explosion also “planted” to look like a terrorist attack or was it all pre-planned? At this point it becomes very frightening!”
These are all very good questions. I have no answers… Only doubts of my own.